AUS/NZ
PC PS XBOX GIRL TV
CG Network:
Login:
? Sign Up!
E-Sports Communities & Competitions

The New Anti-Cheat Board [LOCKED]

Started by Asterix on 12:11am 27/1/08. 138,144 views and 98 posts, 0 users reading, last post by MrFibble.

Currently reading (0 users):
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 Next Last
OP
Joined: 7/4/07
Posts: 4,325
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
100%
CG Co-Founder
I have decided to make the Anti Cheat Board a small team of players who have a clue, rather then a large group of "team representatives" as it will be significantly better for the community in general.

The new Anti Cheat Board currently is: Asterix, tal, Field Marshal, rhinoxeros and SkenZ

Over the past few weeks there have been a number of issues with the Anti-Cheat Team, which have been very obvious to the community. Over the past two days, the Anti Cheat Team has gone from a body of over 30 people, down to currently 5. The aims, values, system and process of the team have all changed, to better reflect the community's needs. It is this rebirth of the Anti Cheat Board that CyberGamer is expecting to be more successful, as the new board moves to try to set-up links with anti-cheat teams from other leagues both international and domestic as well as with PunkBuster, for the best results for the community.

Therefore, the first action of the new Anti Cheat Board is to revoke the ban placed on ZR player 'Kudios'. We ask the community supports the new boards' action in reviewing the decisions made by the previous team, and changing any if they were made improperly. This revoke is due to new evidence, new system; new board. This does not, however mean we will not go further with this issue, or with any other issues. The new board feels there was not enough evidence to place a ban on him initially. We will however be requiring him to upload his demo after every CyberGamer match.

This is a new age for Anti-Cheat within CyberGamer. The Anti Cheat Board has been restructured, with new rules, guidelines, a new ethic and values that reflect what the community ask of us. We committed to achieving justice, in the truest sense of the word, for the community; equality and fairness, with a good mix of consistency.

Thanks
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
  • CG Contributions:
  • Site Developer
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 6,769
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Safari 533.1
Rep:
73%
PC CoD Admin
PC MW2 Admin
goOd luck
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
  • CG Contributions:
  • PC MW3 Admin
gameplex since 2003 ~ [20:09] tal ~ secondrate: man I had to work all day [20:09] tal ~ secondrate: so shit
Joined: 8/12/07
Posts: 1,490
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
65%
Game Administrator
Sounds like a refreshing of the people and policies will be welcomed by the community. Good luck guys & thanks.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Joined: 15/12/07
Posts: 135
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 3.5
Rep:
42%
Sounds like a good way to go Asterix.

Just a question? Has the League thought about streaming to PB Bans or Punksbusted? The extra MD5 and possible CVAR checks are a nice addition.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Joined: 29/11/07
Posts: 285
Defaults: AU - PS3: Guitar Hero
using Internet Explorer 8.0
Rep:
45%
cool
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
.tofu
Joined: 8/12/07
Posts: 1,490
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
65%
Game Administrator
I also think the Black PBSS should be the first serious issue dealt with.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Joined: 23/11/07
Posts: 2,496
Defaults: AU - PC: Medal Of Honor
using Firefox 3.6
Rep:
46%
PUG Administrator
gl with the new anti cheat team.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 1,961
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
51%
....nice
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Joined: 9/6/07
Posts: 1,583
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
35%
very good decision i think
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
"Think of any of the best snipers in AusCoD, and they will not have played anywhere near as good or confident in their life." -- Sensuki
Joined: 1/5/07
Posts: 1,800
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 3.6
Rep:
41%
good way to head imo
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Spachala, aus cods mr hot chocolate
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 969
Defaults: AU - PC: Counter-Strike Source
using Chrome 17.0
Rep:
50%
nice, 1 step forward, 2 steps back.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 3,259
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
49%
wow i didnt get to see the replies after my comment in the AC forums...

yawn... disapointing that the pathetic attempt at evidence that was brought forward changed the decision entirely and that a blatant cheater as determined (16-2) by the AntiCheatTeam is now palying again.

the only good thing as far as i can see from this decision is the small anti cheat team. 5 people is good.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Check out my music @ www.soundcloud.com/james-hunter
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 3,259
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 16.0
Rep:
49%
Quote from smutzy:
good way to head imo

...

*kudios unbanned*

'good way to head imo'

wow didn't expect anyone from ZR to say that...

the pain continues for us that h8 cheaters... =(
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Check out my music @ www.soundcloud.com/james-hunter
Joined: 1/5/07
Posts: 1,800
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 3.6
Rep:
41%
PBbans Head Admin / Founder > Yoda
When it comes to watching a demo for hacks

and yoda, in all honesty, even if kudios didnt get unbanned, i still think its a better way to go having 5 people make decisions then 30+.

Edited once, 27/1/08 - 4:11am.
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
Spachala, aus cods mr hot chocolate
Joined: 13/4/07
Posts: 87
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 9.0
Rep:
32%
epic
Posted on Sunday, 27th January 2008
I deserve the frag
 
Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 Next Last

The New Anti-Cheat Board [LOCKED]