AUS/NZ
PC PS XBOX GIRL TV STORE
Login:
? Sign Up!
Powered by AMD
E-Sports Communities & Competitions

PLEASE REVIEW VULNERABLE AND PROTECTED STATUS [LOCKED]

Started by DmAuViIrD on 9:35pm 13/6/11. 451 views and 11 posts, 0 users reading, last post by Muzza255.

Currently reading (0 users):
OP
Joined: 7/6/10
Posts: 101
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: FIFA
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
44%
I seriously think cybergamer should review there vulnerable/protected status, they stated when it was newly released this should get people up the ladder faster

Well i defeated #2 (7th June) was waiting for 1 to be unprotected on the 8th of June and the guy i beat in #3 got to challenge #1 b4 i did WTF, cause we both only had 12 hours of our status (maybe the loser should receive 16h so the winner gets an extra 4 hours to challenge a higher position) , a guy can lose then gets to challenge number 1 and then i get challenge again and lose and get challenged again and lose all while waiting to get a shoot at #1

Please review this immediately, it an issue which needs to be addressed
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
Joined: 7/4/10
Posts: 2,965
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: Call of Duty: MW3
using Firefox 12.0
Rep:
58%
Xbox AFL Admin
Xbox CoD PUG Admin
he simply beat you to the challenge........ not much you can do about that.
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
  • CG Contributions:
  • Xbox Referee
  • Xbox GoW PUG Admin
  • Premium Tag:
  • Carrion
OP
Joined: 7/6/10
Posts: 101
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: FIFA
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
44%
But is that fair the guy i beat gets first crack @ #1, when i clearly established myself as the next in line
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
Joined: 20/10/10
Posts: 3,200
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: Black Ops
using Safari 533.18
Rep:
42%
he didnt get a crack at 1st before you

he just beat u to it
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
Back to narnia
Joined: 12/8/08
Posts: 3,588
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: Call of Duty
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
53%
Yeah you would have been able to challenge first champ, you must have checked it to late, he got the challenge in but you were able to challenge first.

It's a good system imo.
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
OP
Joined: 7/6/10
Posts: 101
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: FIFA
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
44%
I understand he beat me too it

But is that fair????? - thats the point in trying to promote here

Cause ultimately this has now left me further down the ladder
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
OP
Joined: 7/6/10
Posts: 101
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: FIFA
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
44%
i wasnt able to challenge first as he was protected and by the time he was unprotected

both myself and the guy who was vulnerable also didnt have any status, so effectively any advantage status would of given me is erased cause #1 was protected
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
Joined: 12/8/08
Posts: 3,588
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: Call of Duty
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
53%
Okay so you both would have been able to challenge at the same time, he just beat you their.

Gotta check CG champ, it's all part of the fun
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
OP
Joined: 7/6/10
Posts: 101
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: FIFA
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
44%
I was checking

and yes he beat me to the punch

My point thought

IS THIS FAIR

And i believe it isnt

What about introducing a rule for the top ten where the status of people who lose when defending is 16-20 hours therefore it give the guys who work time to get home and challenge for higher spots
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
Joined: 7/4/10
Posts: 2,965
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: Call of Duty: MW3
using Firefox 12.0
Rep:
58%
Xbox AFL Admin
Xbox CoD PUG Admin
its fair nothing is going to be changed just because some one beat you to a challenge that is just, how it goes sometimes .
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
  • CG Contributions:
  • Xbox Referee
  • Xbox GoW PUG Admin
  • Premium Tag:
  • Carrion
Joined: 12/4/09
Posts: 370
Defaults: AU - XBOX360: FIFA 12
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
55%
Quote from DmAuViIrD on the 13th of June 2011:
i wasnt able to challenge first as he was protected and by the time he was unprotected

both myself and the guy who was vulnerable also didnt have any status, so effectively any advantage status would of given me is erased cause #1 was protected

Your advantage wasn't erased because #1 was protected. Your advantage simply lay in the fact that no one could challenge you while the player you beat was vulnerable to challenges. You just got unlucky that no one took the opportunity to challenge him.
Posted on Monday, 13th June 2011
 

PLEASE REVIEW VULNERABLE AND PROTECTED STATUS [LOCKED]