AUS/NZ
PC PS XBOX GIRL TV STORE
Login:
? Sign Up!
Powered by AMD
0wning n00bs since '07

Page 3: AMD 10 Core 2012?

Started by b0bftw on 9:47pm 27/7/11. 1,462 views and 41 posts, 0 users reading, last post by Grinlock.

Currently reading (0 users):
Page 3 of 3 First Prev 1 2 3
Joined: 25/2/10
Posts: 513
Defaults: AU - PC: DotA
using Opera 9.80
Rep:
44%
But surely this is the retail box grumpy? Because people are getting tired of the Bulldozer rumor mill .



Posted on Friday, 7th October 2011
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 6,734
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 12.0
Rep:
59%
PC Platform Mod
I'm not sure, I haven't seen the retail box yet.
Posted on Friday, 7th October 2011
may be biased towards good products - Check out my Blog
Joined: 31/5/08
Posts: 44
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
44%
well it was said in a AMD interview. But Shop owners are unaware of a release date. So i was just wondering if it was a fake. Or they not aware.
Posted on Saturday, 8th October 2011
█ [url]http://www.blackrainhosting.com[/url] █ Shared Web Hosting Located In Dallas,TX
Joined: 5/12/09
Posts: 205
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
43%
Here's a leaked review of BD. http://lab501.ro/procesoare-chipseturi/amd-fx-8150-bulldozer-preview (You'll have to use google translate)

If the review is actually legit BD is a massive fail.Clock for Clock, Bulldozer is slower than P2. =/

Quote from Conclusion:
Unfortunately for us Bulldozer was not what we expected, and the disappointment is even greater as this architecture marks five years since AMD has lost market leadership processors, and 5 years from the last iteration of the FX brand . As a user of the Athlon 64, I remember the aura of exclusivity now that benefited expensive FX series processors, which fully deserves its price but because they were able performance. 5 years later, we are dealing with the hurting memory of his ancestors FX, a significantly lower performance than the competition and significantly higher consumption. And, in this case the price really does not matter. We want to see $ 1,000 AMD processors able to fight alongside solutions from Intel, not cheap products that do not justify their price anyway.
We can only hope that AMD will somehow fix the problem even in short-term energy consumption by a new revision, otherwise quite dark days loom for this area, as lack of real competition at this level does not bring anything good for the consumer final.



The worst part is this:
Quote:
Now the saddest thing is not only the performance, but also the way in which AMD tries to manage this. I heard from a little birdie that some folks at AMD will start calling press tomorrow morning to ask them how reviews are going and try to do some damage control (this reminds me of Nvidia calling press before GTX480 launch). Actually many of the press guys I talked to are a little bit puzzled and don't really know how to approach this situation. From my point of view it is pretty clear, the truth (no matter how much it hurts) is the only way.

I was honestly hoping AMD would regain some marketshare with BD but it doesn't look like it, especially with the enthusiast market. I sincerely hope these benchmarks are false and BD comes at least close to the i7 2600K.
Posted on Monday, 10th October 2011
Joined: 9/4/07
Posts: 6,734
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 12.0
Rep:
59%
PC Platform Mod
I can see one reason about the above ^ but I won't mention it yet till NDA is lifted.

Just a hunch.
Posted on Monday, 10th October 2011
may be biased towards good products - Check out my Blog
Joined: 25/2/10
Posts: 513
Defaults: AU - PC: DotA
using Opera 9.80
Rep:
44%
Meh, it explains why they didn't want to do a direct comparison with the 2600K to begin with. You can only do so much on the 32nm process and this only proves. Doesn't help the industry when Intel's fabs are one generation ahead of the competition (i.e. TSMC, Global Foundries), as well as their architecture.
Posted on Monday, 10th October 2011
Joined: 31/5/08
Posts: 44
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
44%
Quote from infinite;D on the 10th of October 2011:
Here's a leaked review of BD. http://lab501.ro/procesoare-chipseturi/amd-fx-8150-bulldozer-preview (You'll have to use google translate)

If the review is actually legit BD is a massive fail.Clock for Clock, Bulldozer is slower than P2. =/

Settings used: 1280 x 1024, 8xAA, Maximum details (games)
AMD shines at high res. not a low shitty 1280x1024.
this is where Fx series are making there mark. Dominating intel at High res.
Posted on Tuesday, 11th October 2011
█ [url]http://www.blackrainhosting.com[/url] █ Shared Web Hosting Located In Dallas,TX
Joined: 31/5/08
Posts: 44
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
44%
Saying that, personally AMD should of released this batch no a new socket. Not the old, old AM3 socket that supports CPU's from 2003; that's still going...

Not believing in reviews till they are released by trusted Aussie bench markers as such.
Posted on Tuesday, 11th October 2011
█ [url]http://www.blackrainhosting.com[/url] █ Shared Web Hosting Located In Dallas,TX
Joined: 24/12/08
Posts: 7,253
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 19.0
Rep:
53%
get your shit together AMD, I wanna be able to get intel chips at a competitive price
Posted on Tuesday, 11th October 2011
Gaijin
Joined: 5/12/09
Posts: 205
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Firefox 11.0
Rep:
43%
Quote from Grinlock on the 11th of October 2011:
Not believing in reviews till they are released by trusted Aussie bench markers as such.

What's wrong with Guru3d, Anandtech etc? Why does it have to be Australian lol. I know the source I linked may not be that legitimate, it was just some news to break the discussion until reviews from more official sources.

I do agree however, they definitely should've ditched the backwards compatible ploy and allow themselves to not be limited by previous generation technologies.
Posted on Tuesday, 11th October 2011
Joined: 31/5/08
Posts: 44
Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty
using Chrome 18.0
Rep:
44%
Quote from infinite;D on the 11th of October 2011:
What's wrong with Guru3d, Anandtech etc? Why does it have to be Australian lol. I know the source I linked may not be that legitimate, it was just some news to break the discussion until reviews from more official sources.

Well, the fact is that CPU's shouldn't been released till AMD released them yesterday. Now them review...
Until you get at full HD res, intel shitting on it. Even at 1980x1080 it's still behind...
Lets have a look at that price. fx-8150 $360; i7 2600k $340...
FAIL AMD...
Not even a value chip. Just bad.
Life remains on it's course with Intel, AMD have lost this one.
Posted on Thursday, 13th October 2011
█ [url]http://www.blackrainhosting.com[/url] █ Shared Web Hosting Located In Dallas,TX
 
Page 3 of 3 First Prev 1 2 3

Page 3: AMD 10 Core 2012?