Here's a leaked review of BD.
http://lab501.ro/procesoare-chipseturi/amd-fx-8150-bulldozer-preview (You'll have to use google translate)
If the review is actually legit BD is a massive fail.Clock for Clock, Bulldozer is slower than P2. =/
Quote from Conclusion:
Unfortunately for us Bulldozer was not what we expected, and the disappointment is even greater as this architecture marks five years since AMD has lost market leadership processors, and 5 years from the last iteration of the FX brand . As a user of the Athlon 64, I remember the aura of exclusivity now that benefited expensive FX series processors, which fully deserves its price but because they were able performance. 5 years later, we are dealing with the hurting memory of his ancestors FX, a significantly lower performance than the competition and significantly higher consumption. And, in this case the price really does not matter. We want to see $ 1,000 AMD processors able to fight alongside solutions from Intel, not cheap products that do not justify their price anyway.
We can only hope that AMD will somehow fix the problem even in short-term energy consumption by a new revision, otherwise quite dark days loom for this area, as lack of real competition at this level does not bring anything good for the consumer final.
The worst part is this:
Quote:
Now the saddest thing is not only the performance, but also the way in which AMD tries to manage this. I heard from a little birdie that some folks at AMD will start calling press tomorrow morning to ask them how reviews are going and try to do some damage control (this reminds me of Nvidia calling press before GTX480 launch). Actually many of the press guys I talked to are a little bit puzzled and don't really know how to approach this situation. From my point of view it is pretty clear, the truth (no matter how much it hurts) is the only way.
I was honestly hoping AMD would regain some marketshare with BD but it doesn't look like it, especially with the enthusiast market. I sincerely hope these benchmarks are false and BD comes at least close to the i7 2600K.
Posted on Monday, 10th October 2011