Page 3: CGi: Effectz vs envious

Started by delish on 10:51pm 11/9/11. 1,245 views and 32 posts, 0 users reading, last post by neekpad.

Currently reading (0 users):

Page 3 of 3

Jump to Page:

First

Prev 1 2 3

Jacko.

Joined: 21/3/10

Posts: 2,795

Defaults: AU - PS3: Call of Duty: MW3

using Internet Explorer 9.0

Rep:

55%

Quote from Zenixx on the 12th of September 2011:

Quote from Nakeeeed on the 12th of September 2011:

Quote from Zenixx on the 12th of September 2011:

Quote from Jacko. on the 11th of September 2011:

gg Fx

www.cybergamer.com.au/forums/thread/177316/CGo:-EffectZ-vs-Art-of-S-T-Y-L-E-!/

Why even bother being a ****wit?

P2P is nothing like CGo. Teams actually work at getting their shit as good as they can not just rocking up and playing.

anyways gg Fx thought it would be close and good effort nvs couldve gone either way.

No your wrong, P2P is very much like CGo, any team can play, hardly any teams care except for the top few, you've got these few teams that try hardout and do well for their skill level, CGi/m/a/d is where teams really put effort in.

true on ps3. But i remember BO p2p and the level was stepped up from BO CGo. People care less about mw2 and barely scrim on it for whatever reason. PS3 is just inactive as ****.

im friends with basically all of Fx so if yu dont know the situation don't comment...were just joking.

nd stop complaining about ps3 activity we are doing just fine as it is.

Posted on Monday, 12th September 2011

eaztside - forever .