There are good arguments for both sides really. mlg rules allow for the highest and best quality in competition, best accuracy from distance etc and rely less on superior connection. In saying that, although mlg rules are my personal preference, the cg community is unlikely to consider the rules because the website has different goals and MW3 is almost out. Its a shame more people don't give it serious consideration for a seperate ladder & could potentially help new people get into competitive.

I completely agree with you Rambo....and you know what
THEY SHOULD BRING IN PRO PIPES!

When creating the rule sets, we strive to make them as competitive as possible. Stripping them down to increase the reliance on skill rather than luck as much as possible. Guns such as the FAMAS, AK74u and G11, are all overpowered compared to those in their respective classes. For example, the G11 is an assault rifle with the hip fire spread of an SMG (among other things), and the FAMAS (and AUG) is the fastest shooting weapon in the game, with little compromise in recoil and accuracy.


In relation to this, the FAMAS actually puts those with a better connection at a considerable advantage due to how quickly it kills. PS3 connection is different to PC, and even playing on half health on PS3 puts those with a worse connection at a considerable disadvantage, because they have little chance to escape while being shot IMO. That in itself is a whole other argument though.

I agree that the decerto-style ruleset of current cybergamer ladders is great and shouldn't be changed. I'm talking about an additional ladder with different rules and strategies and I can understand your point of view on those rules. Haha yeah the connection thing is another argument altogether, agree to disagree.

The Quantic fanboy is right.