Short of reading 100's of posts i just wanted to grab a generalised opinion of weapons in matches, please fill out ze poll.

it needs to be more specific than that tbh

M16 v AK for first season.

If there is some middle ground, some weapons NEED Red Dot/Holo Sights, but if thats not an option there are plenty of other guns to use.

I'll be using stock weapons and no attachments if i decide to play this competitively

Attachments that don't affect the accurary/rate of fire/sound of the gun should be considered.
I.e. Red Dot Sights, just not iron sight because that's just customisation of your aiming HUD.

Edit* Why we considering no mortars straight off the bat?

Whenever I've participated in scrims the squads are divided in two classes only - Assault/Engi.
Allowing Mortar opens the potential for maybe the odd support player in your games. I much prefer C4 than the mortar and probably would never consider to use a mortar but it's a massive asset that was added so more people would play that class. Even so, it's the least played class in terms of hours and points (even less then recon). Plus, laying out a backwards marker mortar playing in a 10 v 10 is a very high-risk move as it takes someone off the battlefield pretty much.

Edited 4 times, last edited 7/11/11 - 10:08pm.

huh?

Why cant we set up a trail ladder to test these suggetions out, we did it for Wolf and Brink why not this

How flexible is the game with limiting unlocks, is it tiered or individual or?

let us use everything bar tac light, laser and mortar tbh, all vehicle unlocks should be allowed

yeaaaaaaaaaaaahh stock weapons!

non existant atm wandy.

www.cybergamer.com.au/forums/thread/266401/BF3-schedule/

Stock with no attachments is the only thing stopping this game from becoming 16v16 F2000/SCAR ******ATION.

WHIP OUT THOSE F2000 BOIS