Join games chatroom

Counter-Strike Section

ESAU: For shame.

Started by terror on 2:53pm 9/10/09. 2,242 views and 17 posts, 0 users reading, last post by inji.

Currently reading (0 users):

1 2 Next

terror

Joined: 11/9/07

Posts: 2,307

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Chrome 19.0

Rep:

54%

http://esau.com.au/read//371019/1/1

el oh el.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

Premium Tag:
pc master race - begone xboxjews

oh, it hurts to be this good.

s a b e r

Joined: 4/12/07

Posts: 2,722

Defaults: AU - PC: Dota 2

using Firefox 12.0

Rep:

58%

Moderator

hacking 1.6 invite is abit of a joke, dunno why he'd bother to come back.

once a cheat , always a cheat.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

raureka

Joined: 7/4/07

Posts: 4815162342

Defaults: AU - PC:

using Firefox 5.0

Rep:

62%

AU Forum Admin

LOL iM

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

tal

Joined: 9/4/07

Posts: 2,829

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Firefox 12.0

Rep:

62%

PC CoD Admin

Sentinel.

All class.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

Current Australian Deathmatch Champion ~ Current Cod2 HQ Champions (Firewizard/Tal)

fyrewurx

Joined: 13/1/08

Posts: 611

Defaults: AU - PC: Soldier of Fortune

using Firefox 8.0

Rep:

35%

an iM palyer got caughter hacking? :S ouch

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

raureka

Joined: 7/4/07

Posts: 4815162342

Defaults: AU - PC:

using Firefox 5.0

Rep:

62%

AU Forum Admin

Quote from Sent1nel:

The simple fact of the matter is you cannot found a professional gaming community on rules, regulations and punishments that to this day do not exist. These need to be readily available online as a link and referred to during all competitions.

For those standing on their soapbox - instead you should be formulating a ruleset along with punishments that can be agreed to and adhered to by the community. I believe cheating in PUGs, Scrims and Public servers also needs to be included. This is where the vast majority of damage is done to the community as new inexperienced players simply move on.

Ultimately no one is arguing Steel should be punished. People are arguing over the severity.

GL HF at WCG and safe travels

ROFL

You see lads, what matters here isn't that an iM player cheated, it's that ESAU doesn't have a codified rule-set to deal with hackers. Totally.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

scream

Joined: 6/11/07

Posts: 955

Defaults: AU - PC: League of Legends

using Firefox 3.6

Rep:

64%

GUF LoL Admin
GUF LoL Admin

Quote from fyrewurx on the 9th of October 2009:

an iM palyer got caughter hacking? :S ouch

no, he left iM, then joined encore, cheated in an online comp then iM recruited him again

stupid as imo but ohh well..

sten has also put a 500$ bounty on anyteam to beat iM

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

www.twitter.com/mindfreakLoL

inji

Joined: 23/11/07

Posts: 2,496

Defaults: AU - PC: Medal Of Honor

using Firefox 3.6

Rep:

46%

PUG Administrator

don't blame everyone for getting angry - proven cheater gets to play wcg, just digusting...

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

fyrewurx

Joined: 13/1/08

Posts: 611

Defaults: AU - PC: Soldier of Fortune

using Firefox 8.0

Rep:

35%

ROFL

iM recruited him before he was found out? or after?

if after, iM = baddies

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

inji

#10

Joined: 23/11/07

Posts: 2,496

Defaults: AU - PC: Medal Of Honor

using Firefox 3.6

Rep:

46%

PUG Administrator

after i think.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

Geary

#11

Joined: 9/4/07

Posts: 5,347

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Chrome 18.0

Rep:

54%

PC Platform Mod

odd how they kicked teddyt for hacking in a pug, then recruit steel who hacked in a comp with prizes P)

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

BeasT

#12

Joined: 15/6/07

Posts: 719

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Firefox 3.6

Rep:

48%

Quote from raureka on the 9th of October 2009:

Quote from Sent1nel:

The simple fact of the matter is you cannot found a professional gaming community on rules, regulations and punishments that to this day do not exist. These need to be readily available online as a link and referred to during all competitions.

For those standing on their soapbox - instead you should be formulating a ruleset along with punishments that can be agreed to and adhered to by the community. I believe cheating in PUGs, Scrims and Public servers also needs to be included.
This is where the vast majority of damage is done to the community as new inexperienced players simply move on.

Ultimately no one is arguing Steel should be punished. People are arguing over the severity.

GL HF at WCG and safe travels

ROFL

You see lads, what matters here isn't that an iM player cheated, it's that ESAU doesn't have a codified rule-set to deal with hackers. Totally.

Well if there is no unified ruleset that is strictly adhered to (regarding cheating ofcourse), how can you expect team's, especially high calibre teams to not invite great players based on offenses that may or may not be punished?

I'm sure your already aware that the majority of CS players arent equipped with the same morale compass as CoD players when it comes to cheating. That certainly does not make it tolerable. But it still remains that there is no unified punishments for cheating, and in previous instances when there has been punishments, those being LAN punishments for cheating online, they have been overturned.

A good analogy would be professional sports teams.. when a player is caught and punished for illegal substance abuse, once his punishment is over he will still get recruited by a team if he is a good player.

To put it in perspective .. Do you think Immunity, being a competitive CS LAN team, would recruit a player that is banned from ALL future LAN events? Personally, I don't think they would.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

as long as theres record there is really no difference between lan and online... - firewizard

bazz

#13

Joined: 31/12/07

Posts: 4,048

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Firefox 10.0

Rep:

40%

why do they have to hack in professional level anyways?

ur good enough to be there without them

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

trailblazer

#14

Joined: 13/4/07

Posts: 415

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Firefox 6.0

Rep:

43%

Scotty's morale compass is pointing in the right direction

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

tal

#15

Joined: 9/4/07

Posts: 2,829

Defaults: AU - PC: Call of Duty

using Firefox 12.0

Rep:

62%

PC CoD Admin

Quote from BeasT on the 9th of October 2009:

Do you think Immunity, being a competitive CS LAN team, would recruit a player that is banned from ALL future LAN events? Personally, I don't think they would.

isnt that the point, the decision got changed to suit iM?

eitherway cheating to win a competition is ******* disgusting.

edit: also getting let off with a slap on the wrist "dont do it again" is even more disgusting.

Edited once, 9/10/09 - 9:39pm.

Posted on Friday, 9th October 2009

Current Australian Deathmatch Champion ~ Current Cod2 HQ Champions (Firewizard/Tal)