What?

Yes it can be won in those ways, that's not what i'm saying at all. With best of 6, before anyone can win, you have to have played an equal amount of rounds, 2x attack and 2x defence, which gives both teams an equal shot at both sides.

With best of 4, one team can win by playing the easier side twice, and only having to play the harder side once. I'm not saying this will always be the case, as both teams could win their first defensive rounds or whatever. But it is bias towards whoever starts on the easier side first, how can you not see this? rofl.

jezR is right, Bogan is Bogan.

lol

For a team to win, they have to win on the harder side. That means that someone loses on the easy side.

If no-one ever wins on the harder side, it's always a draw.

It really makes **** all difference to the outcome if that 'harder' side win happens in the first round or the last round.

4v4 is exactly the same as it is now. The only way you can win without winning on the harder side is if their team drops out.



Thats good m8.

Cool dawg, no one ever said this wasn't the case.

get him cuzzy

Any news on when CG will have servers for us to use instead of clan servers

Waiting on answers from Asterix and or Talnoy.

Sooo many bugs

Spoke to Redding and Syrim both dont know what is happening below..( apparently waiting to speak to ASTERIX on the bugs)

*EDIT* Fixed for now but just some bugs teams might want to look out for ..


Edited once, 7/2/12 - 3:03pm.

Refer to http://www.cybergamer.com.au/forums/thread/p5627216#5627216

If anyone has this issue let me know and ill will fix it.

That's how an ELO Rating system works. If there were 1000 chess players who started on 1000 points and after the first game the Winning player won 5 points and the losing player lost 5 points this would mean that the rankings are: Player on 1005 First, everyone else on 1000 points 2nd tie and the guy with 995 points would be dead last by himself.

If between that time no other game played again and first place wanted to play last place against, the points are rewarded according to their ratings. I.e. If the player coming last won he would receive 7.5 and the player coming first lost he would most likely lose 6. It's really not that hard of a concept. Everyone started on the same points and most default teams are sitting on 1400 still when you dropped your game and went below 1400, you went below everyone else. You will never gain points simply for participating in a match.


This is a loophole that will not be fixed anytime soon, if ever. The Elo Rating system got knocked back last year specifically for BF3 because of this flaw when it was found August last year.

Personally I love ELO rating systems. They are an appropriate measure of a teams rank once it gets kicked off, onfortunately the CG Elo system needs tweaks.

dawson mad

does declining a match have negative effects in this ladder?

not from what i've read

Yes it does, if someone declines then they will/should receive a loss. If they don't please send the match link to an admin and they will fix it